| Molyneuxs Problem |
Ein von Geburt
Blinder betastet eine Kugel und einen Würfel etwa gleicher
Größe. Nun erhält dieser Blinder die Sehkarft und eben diese
Kugel und den Würfel betrachten. Kann er ohne sie zu betasten
sagen, welches die Kugel ist?
|
|
Am Samstag den 7.Juli 1688 [1] schrieb William
Molyneux (1656 1698) an John
Locke:
Dublin July. 7. 88
A Problem Proposed to the Author of the Essai
Philosophique concernant L'Entendement
A Man, being born blind, and having a Globe and a Cube, nigh of the same bignes, Committed into his Hands, and being taught or Told, which is Called the Globe, and which the Cube, so as easily to distinguish them by his Touch or Feeling: Then both being taken from Him, and Laid on a Table, Let us suppose his Sight Restored to Him; Whether he Could, by his Sight, and before he touch them, know which is the Globe and which the Cube? Or Whether he Could know by his Sight, before he stretchd out his Hand, whether he Could not Reach them, tho they were Removed 20 or 1000 feet from him? If the Learned and Ingenious Author of the Forementiond Treatise think this problem Worth his Consideration and Answer, He may at any time Direct it to One That Much Esteems him, and is His Humble Servant William Molyneux High Ormonds Gate in Dublin. Ireland |
| [1] Nach dem Julianischen Kalender, der in England bis 1752
benutzt wurde. Encyclopædia Britannica: "Such a strategy was proposed in a letter to the British philosopher John Locke by a fellow philosopher William Molyneux in 1690." |
| William
Molyneux 17. 4. 1656 11. 10. 1698 Verwalter und Politiker, beschäftigte sich mit Optik 1678 heiratete er Lucy Domville, die zwei Monate später aufgrund eines Schlaganfalls rasch erblindete 1692 Dioptrica Nova, das erste nennenswerte Buch über Optik in englisch. |
| John Locke antwortete
nie auf Molyneuxs Brief von 1688. Doch Jahre später traten die beiden in
Briefwechsel und behandelten auch Molyneuxs Problem. Ab der 2. Ausgabe von
Lockes An Essay concerning Humane Understanding, 1694, war darin auch
das Problem angesprochen. Molyneux selbst nahm an, daß der Ex-Blinde den Zusammenhang zwischen taktiler und visueller Erfahrung nicht unmittelbar herstellen kann. Im Laufe der Jahrhunderte beschäftigten sich zahlreiche Philosophen mit dem Problem: John Locke, George Berkeley, Thomas Reid, Leibniz, Voltaire, La Mettrie, Étienne Bonnot de Condillac, Diderot, Gareth Evans; aber auch Psychologen: Johannes Müller, Hermann Helmholtz, William James; und Mediziner: William Cheselden, J. C. August Franz. Die experimentale Folgerung aus den operativen Eingriffen: Das neue Sehvermögen benötigt einige Zeit zur Anpassung bevor der Proband Molyneuxs Fragen korrekt beantworten kann. |
| Links |
| Verwandte Themen |
| Literatur |
| Abbott, T. K. (1904): "Fresh light on Molyneux' problem. Dr. Ramsay's case". Mind 13.52. S. 543-554 |
| Berchielli, Laura (2002): "Color, space, and figure in Locke: An interpretation of the Molyneux problem". Journal of the History of Philosophy 40.1. S. 47-65 |
| Bolton, Martha B. (1994): "The real Molyneux question and the basis of Locke's answer". In: Locke's Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. |
| Campbell, John (1996): "Molyneux's question". Philosophical Issues 7 |
| Campbell, John (2005): "Information-processing, phenomenal consciousness and Molyneux's question". In: Thought, Reference, and Experience: Themes From the Philosophy of Gareth Evans. Oxford: Clarendon Press |
| Campbell, John (2005): "Molyneux's question and cognitive impenetrability". In Athanassios Raftopoulos, Hg.: Cognitive Penetrability of Perception: Attention, Strategies and Bottom-Up Constraints. New York: Nova Science |
| Eilan, Naomi M. (1993): "Molyneux's question and the idea of an external world". In: Spatial Representation. Cambridge: Blackwell |
| Gallagher, Shaun (2006): "The Molyneux problem". In: How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press |
| Held, Richard, Yuri Ostrovsky, Beatrice de Gelder,
Tapan Gandhi, Suma Ganesh, Umang Mathur, Pawan Sinha (2011): " The newly
sighted fail to match seen with felt". Nature Neuroscience 14, 551-553
|
| Hight, Marc A. (2002): "Why we do not see what we feel". Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83.2. S. 148-162 |
| Hopkins, Robert (2005): "Molyneux's Question". Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35.3. S. 441-464 |
| Hopkins, Robert (2005): "Thomas Reid on Molyneux's Question". Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86.3. S. 340-364 |
| Jacomuzzi, Alessandra C., Pietro Kobau, Nicola Bruno (2003): "Molyneux's question redux". Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2.4 S. 255-280 |
| John Murphy, Joseph (1876): "Space through sight and touch". Mind 1.2 S. 284-285 |
| Levin, Janet (2007): "Molyneux's Question and the Individuation of Perceptual Concepts". Philosophical Studies in print. |
| Loar, Brian (1996): "Comments on John Campbell, Molyneux's question". Philosophical Issues 7 |
| Ludwig, Kirk (1996): "Shape Properties and Perception". Philosophical Issues 7. S. 325-350 |
| Martin, Michael W. (1992): "Sight and touch". In: The Contents of Experience. New York: Cambridge University Press |
| Meltzoff, Andrew N. (1993): "Molyneux's babies: Cross-modal perception, imitation, and the mind of the preverbal infant". In: Spatial Representation. Cambridge: Blackwell |
| Sassen, Brigitte (2004): "Kant on Molyneux's Problem". British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12.3. S. 471-485 |
| Schumacher, Ralph (2003): "What are the direct objects of sight? Locke on the Molyneux question". Locke Studies 3. S. 41-62 |
| Stratton, G. M. (1899): "The spatial harmony of touch and sight". Mind 8.32 S. 492-505 |
| Thomson, Judith Jarvis (198´74): "Molyneux's Problem". The Journal of Philosophy 71.18. S. 637-650 |
| Bei Amazon nachschauen | |
|
|